Earlier this week, a federal judge in Kentucky issued a decision granting a preliminary injunction to partially block the United States Department of Transportation’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) program. A copy of the decision can be found here. The injunction is limited only to the two plaintiffs (Mid-America Milling and Bagshaw Trucking) and to the two states where they operate (Kentucky and Indiana). However, it may pave the way for future challenges to the program.
The DBE program sets contracting goals of 10% of USDOT contracting dollars to go to firms with DBE certification showing that they are small businesses owned by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. Under the program, women and minorities that have a rebuttable presumption of social and economic disadvantage, while others can make an individual showing of disadvantage.
The plaintiffs in this legal challenge are two companies owned by non-Hispanic white males who claim to have alleged “reverse discrimination” in contracting where federal transportation funding is at play. Notably, it does not appear that either plaintiff attempted to show that they were disadvantaged and thus should qualify for the program.
The Court found that the program, when it comes to these two plaintiffs, was unconstitutional and that its racial and gender classifications of owners violated the principles of equal protection. The Court also recognized that the government would appeal the decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, fully acknowledging that this dispute is not over.
DBEs should note that this decision does not have an immediate effect on any other DBE contracting opportunities outside of those involving these two companies in Kentucky and Indiana. While further challenges to the program are likely, the DBE program remains intact, for now.
If your company needs assistance with DBE or ACDBE certification, please contact Danielle Dietrich, Esq. at ddietrich@potomaclaw.com or 412-449-9141.
This blog is posted with the understanding that the author, publisher, and distributor of this blog and/or any linked publication are not rendering legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinions on specific facts or matters and, accordingly, assume no liability whatsoever in connection with its use. By viewing Potomac Law Group’s blog posts, the reader (‘you”) understands that there is no attorney-client relationship between you and Potomac Law Group. The blog should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney, and you are urged to consult your own legal counsel on any specific legal questions you may have.
Pursuant to applicable rules of professional conduct, portions of this blog may constitute Attorney Advertising.
